Matthias Fuchs wrote: > Hi Wolfgang, > > this patch conflicts with my simple SJA header posted some days ago > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-October/063097.html > > together with a fix for two of our boards - which has not much > to do with CAN. WD asked me to use a C struct to access the SJA1000. > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-October/062902.html > > So where does this bring us? Either we want to use C structs for everything > or decide it from patch to patch :-(
Then it should be changed, of course. This patch is far from being accepted and for the moment it's an implementation detail. I'm especially interested to hear if such a generic CAN interface would serve your purposes as well, as you require access to the SJA1000 somehow. Wolfgang. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
