On Fri, 2017-04-21 at 14:17 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 04/21/2017 11:45 AM, Ley Foon Tan wrote: > > > > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 4:00 AM, Dalon Westergreen > > <dalon.westergr...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 2017-04-20 at 07:12 -0700, Dalon Westergreen wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2017-04-19 at 23:58 -0500, Dinh Nguyen wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 6:21 PM, Dalon Westergreen > > > > > <dalon.westergr...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2017-04-19 at 13:54 -0700, Dalon Westergreen wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2017-04-19 at 15:44 -0500, Dinh Nguyen wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Really including Dalon > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 3:26 PM, Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel. > > > > > > > > > org> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > CC: Dalon Westergreen > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 04/19/2017 02:49 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 04/19/2017 04:29 AM, Ley Foon Tan wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Add SPL support for Arria 10. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Tien Fong Chee <tien.fong.chee@inte > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > l.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ley Foon Tan <ley.foon....@intel.co > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > m> > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > arch/arm/mach-socfpga/spl.c | 72 > > > > > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/spl.c b/arch/arm/mach- > > > > > > > > > > > socfpga/spl.c > > > > > > > > > > > index 0064fc8..f4a3cdd 100644 > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/spl.c > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-socfpga/spl.c > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -19,23 +19,32 @@ > > > > > > > > > > > #include <asm/arch/sdram.h> > > > > > > > > > > > #include <asm/arch/scu.h> > > > > > > > > > > > #include <asm/arch/nic301.h> > > > > > > > > > > > +#include <asm/sections.h> > > > > > > > > > > > +#include <fdtdec.h> > > > > > > > > > > > +#include <watchdog.h> > > > > > > > > > > > +#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_ARRIA10) > > > > > > > > > > > +#include <asm/arch/pinmux.h> > > > > > > > > > > > +#endif > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5) > > > > > > > > > > > static struct pl310_regs *const pl310 = > > > > > > > > > > > (struct pl310_regs *)CONFIG_SYS_PL310_BASE; > > > > > > > > > > > static struct scu_registers *scu_regs = > > > > > > > > > > > (struct scu_registers *)SOCFPGA_MPUSCU_ADDRESS; > > > > > > > > > > > static struct nic301_registers *nic301_regs = > > > > > > > > > > > (struct nic301_registers *)SOCFPGA_L3REGS_ADDRESS; > > > > > > > > > > > -static struct socfpga_system_manager *sysmgr_regs = > > > > > > > > > > > +#endif > > > > > > > > > > > + > > > > > > > > > > > +static const struct socfpga_system_manager *sysmgr_regs = > > > > > > > > > > > (struct socfpga_system_manager > > > > > > > > > > > *)SOCFPGA_SYSMGR_ADDRESS; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > u32 spl_boot_device(void) > > > > > > > > > > > { > > > > > > > > > > > const u32 bsel = readl(&sysmgr_regs->bootinfo); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - switch (bsel & 0x7) { > > > > > > > > > > > + switch (SYSMGR_GET_BOOTINFO_BSEL(bsel)) { > > > > > > > > > > > case 0x1: /* FPGA (HPS2FPGA Bridge) */ > > > > > > > > > > > return BOOT_DEVICE_RAM; > > > > > > > > > > > case 0x2: /* NAND Flash (1.8V) */ > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -68,6 +77,7 @@ u32 spl_boot_mode(const u32 boot_device) > > > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > #endif > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +#if defined(CONFIG_TARGET_SOCFPGA_GEN5) > > > > > > > > > > > static void socfpga_nic301_slave_ns(void) > > > > > > > > > > > { > > > > > > > > > > > writel(0x1, &nic301_regs->lwhps2fpgaregs); > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -85,6 +95,7 @@ void board_init_f(ulong dummy) > > > > > > > > > > > #endif > > > > > > > > > > > unsigned long sdram_size; > > > > > > > > > > > unsigned long reg; > > > > > > > > > > > + int ret; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > /* > > > > > > > > > > > * First C code to run. Clear fake OCRAM ECC first as > > > > > > > > > > > SBE > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -117,7 +128,11 @@ void board_init_f(ulong dummy) > > > > > > > > > > > /* Put everything into reset but L4WD0. */ > > > > > > > > > > > socfpga_per_reset_all(); > > > > > > > > > > > /* Put FPGA bridges into reset too. */ > > > > > > > > > > > - socfpga_bridges_reset(1); > > > > > > > > > > > + ret = socfpga_bridges_reset(1); > > > > > > > > > > > + if (ret) { > > > > > > > > > > > + printf("socfpga_bridges_reset() failed: > > > > > > > > > > > %d\n", > > > > > > > > > > > ret); > > > > > > > > > > > + hang(); > > > > > > > > > > > + } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > socfpga_per_reset(SOCFPGA_RESET(SDR), 0); > > > > > > > > > > > socfpga_per_reset(SOCFPGA_RESET(UART0), 0); > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -148,7 +163,11 @@ void board_init_f(ulong dummy) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > /* De-assert reset for peripherals and bridges based > > > > > > > > > > > on > > > > > > > > > > > handoff > > > > > > > > > > > */ > > > > > > > > > > > reset_deassert_peripherals_handoff(); > > > > > > > > > > > - socfpga_bridges_reset(0); > > > > > > > > > > > + ret = socfpga_bridges_reset(0); > > > > > > > > > > > + if (ret) { > > > > > > > > > > > + printf("socfpga_bridges_reset() failed: > > > > > > > > > > > %d\n", > > > > > > > > > > > ret); > > > > > > > > > > > + hang(); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you keep this patch the way it is, this will cause the > > > > > > > > > > Atlas > > > > > > > > > > board to > > > > > > > > > > hang here. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Dalon, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you check this patch? On the Atlas board, I'm seeing the > > > > > > > > > call to > > > > > > > > > socfpga_bridges_reset(0) fail because > > > > > > > > > fpgamgr_test_fpga_ready() is > > > > > > > > > failing, because is_fpgamgr_initdone_high() is returning 0. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dinh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i saw it the first go round. i will test this out this afternoon. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --dalon > > > > > > > > > > > > i see the exact same thing. for the c5/a5 devices there is no > > > > > > reason for > > > > > > init > > > > > > done to be high since fpga configuration isnt required to boot. > > > > > > > > > > Okay, good! It doesn't happen on the C5 devkit though. > > > > > > > > > > Ley Foon, did you test this on the Arria5? > > > > > > > > > > Dinh > > > > > > > > Odd, init done should not be high without the FPGA configured. i will > > > > try it > > > > on > > > > the c5 board as well to try and figure out why init done is high. > > > > > > > > --dalon > > > > > > I ran this on the c5 socdk and noticed the same behavior as Dinh, then > > > realized > > > the board was setup to configure the fpga independently of the > > > processor. When > > > i change the MSELs on the board to ensure the FPGA is unconfigured the > > > code > > > fails in the same location where init done is not high. It is definitely > > > an > > > expected use case in c5/a5 that uboot can run without the fpga configured > > > at > > > all. > > My proposal is revert back to its original code, revert > > socfpga_bridges_reset() return type to void and don't check error from > > fpgamgr_test_fpga_ready(). So, we can support Gen5 boot without > > program FPGA. > > Isn't the difference between CV/AV and A10 such that the former can boot > without programmed FPGA while the later can NOT boot without programmed > FPGA ? So this code is A10 specific ?
Yes, at a minimum in A10 the IO ring needs to be configured prior to boot. Since these functions (socfpga_bridges_reset) are different for c5/a5 and a10, i would suggest changing the code to enable the bridges IF the fpga is configured. perhaps just: ... } else { writel(0, &sysmgr_regs->iswgrp_handoff[0]); writel(l3mask, &sysmgr_regs->iswgrp_handoff[1]); /* Check signal from FPGA. */ if (!fpgamgr_test_fpga_ready()) { /* brdmodrst */ writel(0, &reset_manager_base->brg_mod_reset); } ... I think this actually mirrors the behavior of the 2013.01.01 fork where if the fpga is configured, spl enables the bridges. --dalon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot