Dear Wolfgang Denk > Dear Jens Scharsig, > > This is close. Of course we should drop the AT91_REG and use standard > types instead, and "PIO_OER" is not a logal variable name either > because it's all-capitals. So this entry should rather look like this: > > ... > u32 pio_oer; > ... >> and >> >> #define AT91C_BASE_PIOC ((AT91PS_PIO) 0xFFFFF800) > > This is definitely deprecated. > >> So the access should be >> >> AT91PS_PIO pioa = AT91C_BASE_PIOA; >> ... >> writel(AT91C_PA23_TXD2, &pioa->PIO_OER); > > Yes, except for the incorrect variable name. >
By the way, the AT91RM9200.h. has hundreds of style problems. This requires a complete revision of the AT91RM9200.h. I can try this, but will take a while and I can't test other RM9200 boards. Best regards, Jens Scharsig _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
