On 22 February 2017 at 20:35, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: > On 20 February 2017 at 03:28, Jacob Chen <jacobchen...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> 2017-02-17 4:44 GMT+08:00 Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 14 February 2017 at 23:41, Jacob Chen <jacob2.c...@rock-chips.com> wrote: >>>> Hi Kever, >>>> >>>> >>>> Kever Yang wrote on 2017年02月15日 14:13: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Jacob, >>>>> >>>>> On 02/15/2017 11:06 AM, Jacob Chen wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> We should remove config_spl_of_platdata to build u-boot-spl-dtb.bin >>>>>> rather than u-boot-spl-nodtb.bin >>>>>> since we use spl_back_to_brom. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Have you try with CONFIG_SPL_OF_PLATDATA on and without SPL_BACK_TO_BROM? >>>>> >>>>> If this works on firefly, then we can still leave it as an example to show >>>>> how both way works. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Firefly had been using CONFIG_SPL_OF_PLATDATA and it works well. >>>> Just it will make trouble for other things to generate the u-boot blob, >>>> like yocto, sdk build scripts, guides... >>>> >>>> At first, I also want to keep CONFIG_SPL_OF_PLATDATA in firefly, but later >>>> I find that i have to do a lot of unnecessary work to deal with it, >>>> so now I would like one chip use one way to generate the u-boot blob. >>> >>> How about having a separate board config like firefly-rk3288-dt so >>> that we keep the non-of-platdata alive? It only needs a separate >>> defconfig, which is pretty esay. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Simon >>> _______________________________________________ >>> U-Boot mailing list >>> U-Boot@lists.denx.de >>> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot >> >> >> I send a patch "rockchip: firefly: configs: add a new config to keep >> non-of-platdata" to save old config. > > OK thanks. > > Acked-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>
Applied to u-boot-rockchip, thanks! _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
