Hi, On 14 February 2017 at 23:41, Jacob Chen <jacob2.c...@rock-chips.com> wrote: > Hi Kever, > > > Kever Yang wrote on 2017年02月15日 14:13: >> >> Hi Jacob, >> >> On 02/15/2017 11:06 AM, Jacob Chen wrote: >>> >>> We should remove config_spl_of_platdata to build u-boot-spl-dtb.bin >>> rather than u-boot-spl-nodtb.bin >>> since we use spl_back_to_brom. >> >> >> Have you try with CONFIG_SPL_OF_PLATDATA on and without SPL_BACK_TO_BROM? >> >> If this works on firefly, then we can still leave it as an example to show >> how both way works. >> > > Firefly had been using CONFIG_SPL_OF_PLATDATA and it works well. > Just it will make trouble for other things to generate the u-boot blob, > like yocto, sdk build scripts, guides... > > At first, I also want to keep CONFIG_SPL_OF_PLATDATA in firefly, but later > I find that i have to do a lot of unnecessary work to deal with it, > so now I would like one chip use one way to generate the u-boot blob.
How about having a separate board config like firefly-rk3288-dt so that we keep the non-of-platdata alive? It only needs a separate defconfig, which is pretty esay. Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
