Hi, 2017-02-17 4:44 GMT+08:00 Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>: > Hi, > > On 14 February 2017 at 23:41, Jacob Chen <jacob2.c...@rock-chips.com> wrote: >> Hi Kever, >> >> >> Kever Yang wrote on 2017年02月15日 14:13: >>> >>> Hi Jacob, >>> >>> On 02/15/2017 11:06 AM, Jacob Chen wrote: >>>> >>>> We should remove config_spl_of_platdata to build u-boot-spl-dtb.bin >>>> rather than u-boot-spl-nodtb.bin >>>> since we use spl_back_to_brom. >>> >>> >>> Have you try with CONFIG_SPL_OF_PLATDATA on and without SPL_BACK_TO_BROM? >>> >>> If this works on firefly, then we can still leave it as an example to show >>> how both way works. >>> >> >> Firefly had been using CONFIG_SPL_OF_PLATDATA and it works well. >> Just it will make trouble for other things to generate the u-boot blob, >> like yocto, sdk build scripts, guides... >> >> At first, I also want to keep CONFIG_SPL_OF_PLATDATA in firefly, but later >> I find that i have to do a lot of unnecessary work to deal with it, >> so now I would like one chip use one way to generate the u-boot blob. > > How about having a separate board config like firefly-rk3288-dt so > that we keep the non-of-platdata alive? It only needs a separate > defconfig, which is pretty esay. > > Regards, > Simon > _______________________________________________ > U-Boot mailing list > U-Boot@lists.denx.de > http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
I send a patch "rockchip: firefly: configs: add a new config to keep non-of-platdata" to save old config. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
