Hi Romain, On 21 January 2017 at 00:51, Romain Perier <romain.per...@collabora.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > Le 21/01/2017 à 04:51, Simon Glass a écrit : >> On 17 January 2017 at 02:32, Romain Perier <romain.per...@collabora.com> >> wrote: >>> Like the rock2, this board has been tested with back to brom feature. >>> This commits adjusts environment offset regarding if back_to_brom is >>> enabled or not and uses this feature by default. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.per...@collabora.com> >>> --- >>> configs/firefly-rk3288_defconfig | 2 ++ >>> include/configs/firefly-rk3288.h | 9 +++++++++ >>> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+) >> We need at least one board that does not use this option. Also, >> doesn't this mean that we need to change how the image is written to >> the board? >> >> Should we use binman to create a suitable image? >> >> Regards, >> Simon > Why do you want at least one board without this option ? for testing > that it's still working without back_to_brom ? That's weird because all > rk3288-based board has the same limitations regarding the SPL, no ?
Yes, but remember this is a non-standard booting mechanism, and one that I hope we can move away from in future. Also firefly does not *need* this mechanism. If we don't have one board that uses the standard mechanism then it might stop working. Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
