Hi,
Le 21/01/2017 à 04:51, Simon Glass a écrit : > On 17 January 2017 at 02:32, Romain Perier <romain.per...@collabora.com> > wrote: >> Like the rock2, this board has been tested with back to brom feature. >> This commits adjusts environment offset regarding if back_to_brom is >> enabled or not and uses this feature by default. >> >> Signed-off-by: Romain Perier <romain.per...@collabora.com> >> --- >> configs/firefly-rk3288_defconfig | 2 ++ >> include/configs/firefly-rk3288.h | 9 +++++++++ >> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+) > We need at least one board that does not use this option. Also, > doesn't this mean that we need to change how the image is written to > the board? > > Should we use binman to create a suitable image? > > Regards, > Simon Why do you want at least one board without this option ? for testing that it's still working without back_to_brom ? That's weird because all rk3288-based board has the same limitations regarding the SPL, no ? Regards, Romain _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
