On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Phil Edworthy
<phil.edwor...@renesas.com> wrote:
> Hi Jagan,
>
> On 30 November 2016 04:59, Jagan Teki wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Phil Edworthy
>> <phil.edwor...@renesas.com> wrote:
>> > Most of the code already uses #defines for the bit value, rather
>> > than the shift required to get the value. This changes the remaining
>> > code over.
>> >
>> > Whislt at it, fix the names of the "Rd Data Capture" register defs.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Phil Edworthy <phil.edwor...@renesas.com>
>> > Acked-by: Marek Vasut <marek.va...@gmail.com>

<snip>

>>
>> I've commented about this change [1]?
>>
>> [1] https://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot@lists.denx.de/msg232120.html
> Yes, I fixed that in a separate patch, see
> https://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot@lists.denx.de/msg232489.html
>
> I did it in a separate patch because this patch is purely about replacing the
> definitions of bit shifts with BIT(x).

Reviewed-by: Jagan Teki <ja...@openedev.com>

thanks!
-- 
Jagan Teki
Free Software Engineer | www.openedev.com
U-Boot, Linux | Upstream Maintainer
Hyderabad, India.
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to