On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 09:43:12PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Scott Wood, > > In message <20090911222349.ga26...@b07421-ec1.am.freescale.net> you wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 12:15:22AM +0100, > > kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk wrote: > > > This patch re-formats the arm920t s3c24x0 nand driver in preparation for > > > changes > > > to add support for the Embest SBC2440-II Board. > > > > > > The changes are as follows: > > > - re-indent the code using Lindent > > > - make sure register layouts are defined using a C struct > > > - replace the upper-case typedef'ed C struct names with lower case > > > non-typedef'ed ones > > > - make sure registers are accessed using the proper accessor functions > > > - run checkpatch.pl and fix any error reports > > > > > > It assumes the following patch has been applied first: > > > - [U-Boot][PATCH-ARM] CONFIG_SYS_HZ fix for ARM902T S3C24X0 Boards, > > > 05/09/2009 > > > - patches 1/4, 2/4 and 3/4 of this series > > > > Acked-by: Scott Wood <scottw...@freescale.com> > > What does that ACK mean? Who is supposed to apply this patch - the ARM > custodian?
Yes, based on the rest of the patchset and "PATCH-ARM" I figured this would be going through the ARM tree. -Scott _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
