On 07/21/2016 03:03 PM, B, Ravi wrote:
> Hi Marek
> 
>>>  
>>>>>> Please explain why this patch fixes the issue.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ok I will explain, due to the commit[1] the resource_size_t size has 
>>>>> increased to 8 bytes (64 bit), compared to earlier 32 bit (4bytes) and 
>>>>> the definition is moved to includes/linux/types.h from asm.h. Due to this 
>>>>> change the code generated in gadget.c is correct, due >to inclusion of 
>>>>> right header file (common.h, which includes linux/types.h). Whereas, the 
>>>>> ep0.c does not includes common.h, hence  size of resources_size_t is 4 
>>>>> bytes, causing wrong offset code generated for structure members which 
>>>>> includes resource_size_t, which >leads to pointing to wrong offset 
>>>>> location causing the crash.
>>>
>>>> This stuff should be in the commit message. Still, git grep 
>>>> resource_size_t does not show that it's used in gadget.c , so I don't 
>>>> understand how this patch can fix things.
>>>
>>> Thanks, I will add this text to commit message. The resource_size_t is 
>>> used in dwc3 structure defined in drivers/usb/dwc3/core.h
>>>
>>> struct dwc3 {
>>>     ....
>>>     struct resource  xhci_resource[DWC3_XHCI_RESOURCES_NUM];
>>>     ..
>>> };
>>> The resource structure defined in include/linux/ioport.h struct 
>>> resource {
>>>     resource_size_t start;
>>>     resource_size_t end;
>>> }
> 
>> OK, I am starting to get a better picture of this issue.
>> But somehow I suspect there is a deeper problem with the includes -- how is 
>> it possible that the compiler didn't complain about the resource_size_t 
>> being undefined, but instead used (incorrectly sized) variant ?
> 
> Yeah, I agree.  Compiler not complaining, may be due to fallback to old 
> definitions (32 bit) of resource_size_t because of right header file is not 
> included.

Well please look into it and properly explain why this happens.

And fix your damned mailer !

> Regards
> Ravi
> 


-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to