Michal Simek wrote: > > this code can't be compiled - you have bad setting. MONITOR_BASE is always on > lower address then > FLASH address. Check that your ram on lower address than your flash - this is > check by u-boot.bsp too. > > > > Regards, > Michal > > > > >
Thanks for that help, and thanks for updating your git repository. I had previously forgotten about the "flash must be above RAM" limitation. I had forgotten, and had rebuilt the project without re-running the BSP, after making the mistake of doing "generate addresses". I've now rebuild the project and BSP with RAM at 0x10000000 and Flash at 0x20000000, but I'm now getting a linking error: u-boot-microblaze/net/eth.c:202: relocation truncated to fit: R_MICROBLAZE_32_PCREL_LO against symbol `board_eth_init' defined in text section in board/xilinx/microblaze-generic/libmicroblaze-generic.a(microblaze-generic.o) I've looked up the error, and about the closest thing I could find was this -- something about "longcall" attribute: http://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot@lists.denx.de/msg04518.html http://fixunix.com/vxworks/48336-how-solve-error-relocation-truncated-fit-r_arm_pc24.html In Microblaze, do the absolute address values matter, or just the relative positioning? I also imagine that perhaps the CompactFlash issues originated from the incorrect clock rate. Thanks again for the help. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
