Hi Heiko, On 17.2.2016 07:34, Heiko Schocher wrote: > Hello Michal, > > Am 16.02.2016 um 17:04 schrieb Michal Simek: >> Hi Heiko, >> >> On 16.2.2016 14:32, Heiko Schocher wrote: >>> Hello Michal, >>> >>> Am 16.02.2016 um 13:12 schrieb Michal Simek: >>>> Hi Stephen, >>>> >>>> trying to run the latest testing on zynq board and getting this >>>> main_signon error. >>>> >>>> This is what I am running >>>> ./test/py/test.py --bd zynq_zc702 --build --board-identity zc702 >>>> and getting below. >>> >>> Does this board has SPL support without SPL serial output? >> >> I do load u-boot via jtag that's why SPL logs are not visible. >> >>> If so, can you try my patch: >>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/583348/ >> >> I have applied your patch but it is still not working. >> >> If I run full flow with SPL then I can't see any issue. > > I am not an expert of test/py (I still try to dig into it), but as > I understand it, it looks if CONFIG_SPL is defined, if so, the > framework expects a SPL output first, if not found, it raises > the error you see ... > > My patch fixes this, for boards which use SPL, but without serial > SPL output ... > > Now you test only u-boot with SPL configured with SPL serial output ... > > I think Stephen can say here more, how to solve this ...
Ok. I have spent some time on this. Your patch is covering a little bit different case than I have. We have in general two used cases. One is to use SPL as first stage bootloader and then private full featured FSBL. Both of them works with the same u-boot image. It means I can build uboot with SPL and run two test sets. One with SPL which is working fine and the second without but there is no reason to rebuild u-boot without SPL just to pass testing. It means the feature I am looking for is more about ignoring SPL signon instead of supporting cases where SPL doesn't print anything. Thanks, Michal _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
