On Thu, 2015-12-24 at 00:16 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > On Wednesday, December 23, 2015 at 11:57:49 PM, Chin Liang See wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-12-23 at 20:02 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > > > I presume you are referring to SPL? FYI, I am still using the > > > > > SPL > > > > > from > > > > > SOCEDS while using latest U-Boot from mainstream. That's why > > > > > I > > > > > didn't > > > > > the issue noticed by Shengjiang and you. > > > > > > > > Well, at least you're honest ... but *sigh*, it'd be nice if > > > > you > > > > tested > > > > mainline only, really. > > > > > > Actually... If there are enough resources, it would be good to > > > keep > > > testing both. There's world beyond mainline Marek does not want > > > to > > > see > > > ;-). > > > > haha :) I just made the switch and noticed some issues. I2C patch > > is > > the first and more to go. > > Is there more ?
For Cyclone V socdk pin mux, they are in good shape where i2c should be the last needed. I need to do the same for Arria V socdk as I am trying to find the board. I am still testing against other. One thing I bump yesterday is the FAT support doesn't work in SPL. That would need some tricks that I did for SOCEDS U-Boot :) Thanks Chin Liang > > Best regards, > Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
