On Monday, December 14, 2015 at 08:54:38 AM, Pavel Machek wrote: > (Please, trim your emails when replying) > > On Mon 2015-12-14 01:58:04, Marek Vasut wrote: > > On Monday, December 14, 2015 at 01:43:58 AM, Chin Liang See wrote: > > > On Mon, 2015-12-14 at 01:22 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > > > > On Monday, December 14, 2015 at 01:11:27 AM, Chin Liang See wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 2015-12-13 at 16:42 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > > > > > > On Sunday, December 13, 2015 at 02:03:02 PM, Chin Liang See > > > > > > After grabbing a coffee > > > > That's a good idea, though I think I will make do with a green tea (抹茶). > > > > > and rethinking, we can have 2 MTD_PARTITION > > > where one for backward compatiblity (supporting raw) while another for > > > UBI. > > > > > > MTDPARTS_RAW > > > 256k(spl), > > > 256k(env), > > > 15872k(boot), > > > -(rootfs) > > > > > > MTDPARTS_UBI > > > 256k(spl), > > > 256k(env), > > > -(UBI) > > > > > > We should make UBI as default then. If user care about backward > > > compatiblity, they shall use the MTDPARTS_RAW then. > > > > Try this: > > > > mtdparts=1m(u-boot),256k(env1),256k(env2),14848k(boot),112m(root),-@1536k > > (UBI) > > > > This will create overlapping partitions "boot,root" and "UBI" . > > Just because you can does not mean that you should. This looks like a > nasty trap for a user.
Please explain in detail why do you think so. Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
