On Monday, December 14, 2015 at 04:22:57 PM, Chin Liang See wrote: > On Mon, 2015-12-14 at 02:25 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > > On Monday, December 14, 2015 at 02:22:32 AM, Chin Liang See wrote: > [...] > > > > > > and rethinking, we can have 2 MTD_PARTITION > > > > > where one for backward compatiblity (supporting raw) while > > > > > another > > > > > for > > > > > UBI. > > > > > > > > > > MTDPARTS_RAW > > > > > 256k(spl), > > > > > 256k(env), > > > > > 15872k(boot), > > > > > -(rootfs) > > > > > > > > > > MTDPARTS_UBI > > > > > 256k(spl), > > > > > 256k(env), > > > > > -(UBI) > > > > > > > > > > We should make UBI as default then. If user care about backward > > > > > compatiblity, they shall use the MTDPARTS_RAW then. > > > > > > > > Try this: > > > > > > > > mtdparts=1m(u > > > > -boot),256k(env1),256k(env2),14848k(boot),112m(root), > > > > -@1536k(UBI) > > > > > > > > This will create overlapping partitions "boot,root" and "UBI" . > > > > > > Nice, let me give it a try. > > > > Make sure to test it in Linux too ;-) > > Yeah, I can successfully mounted with ubifs :) > > Just that I still have the issue with U-Boot ubifsmount although I > already applied the patch for cache ARMV7. I will take a look into ubi > code as I suspect its due to eraseblock size issue.
Keep looking, good luck. The armv7 cache issue is more serious than I thought, I am starting to suspect there is some problem with the L3 interconnect, but I cannot put my finger on it yet. Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
