On 9 December 2015 at 10:24, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote:
> On 6 December 2015 at 11:34, Jagan Teki <jt...@openedev.com> wrote:
>> Since all spi-flash core operations are moved into
>> sf_ops.c then it's better to renamed as spi-flash.c
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jt...@openedev.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/mtd/spi/Makefile                  | 2 +-
>>  drivers/mtd/spi/{sf_ops.c => spi-flash.c} | 7 ++++---
>>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>  rename drivers/mtd/spi/{sf_ops.c => spi-flash.c} (99%)
>
> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>
>
> (but I suggest spi_flash.c is better as it fits with the other files)

I too thought the same, but will rename the remaining to proper have a
plan for the same.

thanks!
-- 
Jagan.
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to