On Fri, 2015-10-09 at 15:44 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:

> > In which case what we would want is a set of choice options for primary and
> > a separate set choice options for secondary (with a none option too in this
> > case) and there would be no duplication of any specific AXPxxx option
> > between both the primary and secondary sets.
> 
> Ah Yes, from what we now know / expect about how things will work on
> boards with 2 pmics that is correct. I'll respin the first patch to change
> things into a choice including a none option.

Do we need a "none" option for the primary case?

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to