On Fri, 2015-10-09 at 15:44 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > > In which case what we would want is a set of choice options for primary and > > a separate set choice options for secondary (with a none option too in this > > case) and there would be no duplication of any specific AXPxxx option > > between both the primary and secondary sets. > > Ah Yes, from what we now know / expect about how things will work on > boards with 2 pmics that is correct. I'll respin the first patch to change > things into a choice including a none option.
Do we need a "none" option for the primary case? _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
