Hello Jagan, On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Jagan Teki <jt...@openedev.com> wrote: > All looks fine as per your patches, but probing flash from board files > isn't a good approach if one more board add similar approach. > > I have an idea similar to "cfi_flash" approach. > > "sf protect on off len" then based on the offset and len write the > protected bits and skips the sectors which are protected by showing > warning say "protected sectors will not be erased!" [1] > > Use the Linux approach[2] for more information, let me know for any more > inputs. > > [1] http://www.denx.de/wiki/view/DULG/UBootCmdGroupFlash#Section_5.9.3.4. > [2] > http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c?id=972e1b7b450a93589b2a4c709e68f68da059aa5c
I think this is a good option however, can we include this one for this release and we can improve it for next? -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot