Hi Simon, On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 11:45 PM, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: > Hi Bin, > > On 23 July 2015 at 09:45, Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com> wrote: >> This approach is different from Simon's approach. It uses objcopy >> to convert u-boot-dtb.bin into an ELF object with all the binary >> content included in the .data section. This elinimates the need >> to include a special section in the payload's linker script. Also >> there is no need to add any ASFLAGS_REMOVE for u-boot-dtb.o. >> >> Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com> >> >> --- >> This patch needs to be applied on top of Simon's efi series. >> >> Makefile | 21 +++++---------------- >> arch/x86/config.mk | 6 +++++- >> arch/x86/cpu/efi/elf_ia32_efi.lds | 3 --- >> arch/x86/cpu/efi/elf_x86_64_efi.lds | 3 --- >> include/efi.h | 2 +- >> lib/efi/efi_stub.c | 5 +++-- >> scripts/Makefile.build | 8 -------- >> 7 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-) > > This is the way that device tree used to work. It was painful to have > to specify the architecture for all the boards. In fact we had code to > work it out. My only concern with this approach is that we add the > required for each arch to do this. However only x86 is currently > support and I don't think it is much of a burden. Also it is good to > get rid of the Makefile hack and this solution is overall tidier. > > Do you think we should apply it over the top of my existing patches? > For now I have merged it into the two patches that need it. >
I am good for current v2 series. Thanks for merging it in. [snip] Regards, Bin _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
