Hi Otavio, On 28 July 2015 at 12:06, Otavio Salvador <otavio.salva...@ossystems.com.br> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: >> On 28 July 2015 at 11:54, Otavio Salvador >> <otavio.salva...@ossystems.com.br> wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: >>>> On 28 July 2015 at 11:45, Otavio Salvador >>>> <otavio.salva...@ossystems.com.br> wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: >>>>>> On 23 July 2015 at 03:36, Chris Packham <judge.pack...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> It could be treated the same way the git project treats gitk and >>>>>>> git-gui. The sources are still included in the main project and >>>>>>> distributed along with the rest of it but they are merged from an >>>>>>> external upstream where the real development happens. The upstream >>>>>>> project is also free to make releases on whatever schedule they >>>>>>> determine (although these days there isn't much development going on >>>>>>> in for gitk/git-gui). >>>>>> >>>>>> That sounds like a useful model. However there are so few patches to >>>>>> patman - is it worth it? >>>>> >>>>> Sure it is; I have asked it in past I think. >>>>> >>>>> I would like to have it in Debian, Arch and other linux distros and >>>>> get more people using it to manage patch series. It is hard to explain >>>>> it can be used for other project it being inside U-Boot source code. >>>> >>>> OK so if we do this, what's the best way to get a repo and a mailing list? >>> >>> I would try github or kernel.org if possible. >> >> I can't see mailing lists in github. > > Sure but it has issues and pull requests. Likely what we need. > >> I've sent a request to kernel.org, and copied you. > > Great :-)
It doesn't look like Greg is keen. I'll take a look at github. Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
