Hi Otavio, On 28 July 2015 at 11:45, Otavio Salvador <otavio.salva...@ossystems.com.br> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: >> On 23 July 2015 at 03:36, Chris Packham <judge.pack...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> It could be treated the same way the git project treats gitk and >>> git-gui. The sources are still included in the main project and >>> distributed along with the rest of it but they are merged from an >>> external upstream where the real development happens. The upstream >>> project is also free to make releases on whatever schedule they >>> determine (although these days there isn't much development going on >>> in for gitk/git-gui). >> >> That sounds like a useful model. However there are so few patches to >> patman - is it worth it? > > Sure it is; I have asked it in past I think. > > I would like to have it in Debian, Arch and other linux distros and > get more people using it to manage patch series. It is hard to explain > it can be used for other project it being inside U-Boot source code.
OK so if we do this, what's the best way to get a repo and a mailing list? > > -- > Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems > http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br > Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
