On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: > On 23 July 2015 at 03:36, Chris Packham <judge.pack...@gmail.com> wrote: >> It could be treated the same way the git project treats gitk and >> git-gui. The sources are still included in the main project and >> distributed along with the rest of it but they are merged from an >> external upstream where the real development happens. The upstream >> project is also free to make releases on whatever schedule they >> determine (although these days there isn't much development going on >> in for gitk/git-gui). > > That sounds like a useful model. However there are so few patches to > patman - is it worth it?
Sure it is; I have asked it in past I think. I would like to have it in Debian, Arch and other linux distros and get more people using it to manage patch series. It is hard to explain it can be used for other project it being inside U-Boot source code. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
