On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Fabio Estevam <feste...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 6:38 AM, Peng Fan <peng....@freescale.com> wrote: >> Since rom code supports the following commands, add new commands support in >> imximage. >> >> 1. CHECK_BITS_SET 4 [address] [mask bit] >> means: >> while ((*address & mask) != mask); >> >> 2. CHECK_BITS_CLR 4 [address] [mask bit] >> means: >> while ((*address & ~mask) != 0); >> >> 2. CLR_BIT 4 [address] [mask bit] >> means: >> *address = *address & ~mask; >> >> dcd_v2_t is redefined, because there may not be only one write data command, >> there may be many different commands like CHECK_BITS_SET, CHECK_BITS_CLR and >> CLR_BIT. >> >> dcd_len is still leaved there, since changing it needs changes for dcd v1. >> For v2, we check whether dcd size is larger than MAX_DCD_SIZE_V2, but not >> dcd_len. >> >> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng....@freescale.com> > > What about just using SPL mechanism instead?
While I agree we ought to use SPL as much as possible I also believe the DCD support should be as complete as possible; some people might have reasons to avoid the SPL and rely on DCD for it. Do you believe SPL can be assumed to be a viable option for everyone? -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
