On 8 May 2015 at 13:51, haikun.w...@freescale.com
<haikun.w...@freescale.com> wrote:
> On 5/8/2015 1:53 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
>> On 8 May 2015 at 08:14, haikun.w...@freescale.com
>> <haikun.w...@freescale.com> wrote:
>>> On 5/7/2015 7:44 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
>>>> On 6 May 2015 at 02:30, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>>> On 5 May 2015 at 05:37, haikun.w...@freescale.com
>>>>> <haikun.w...@freescale.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 5/1/2015 9:54 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 29 April 2015 at 04:40, Haikun Wang <haikun.w...@freescale.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Add command "sf info" to show the information of the current SPI flash
>>>>>>>> device.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Haikun Wang <haikun.w...@freescale.com>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> In current sf driver, we show the debug information during the flash
>>>>>>>> probe
>>>>>>>> period.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In case of without DM SPI, we need to run command "sf probe" to get
>>>>>>>> the debug
>>>>>>>> information of the current SPI flash device. "sf probe" will
>>>>>>>> re-identify the
>>>>>>>> device every time and it reduce the efficiency. We can get the debug
>>>>>>>> information
>>>>>>>> without any re-identify process using "sf info".
>>>>
>>>> So for non-dm case, sf probe and sf info does same?
>>> For non-dm case, sf info only show the information store in the current
>>> struct spi_flash, sf_probe will re-probe the SPI flash and create a new
>>> struct spi-flash.
>>
>> How could it be, in non-dm case sf probe will detect the flash and
>> print the info
>> from drivers/mtd/spi/sf_probe.c So sf probe every-time will
>> re-identify the device
>> and print the info.
> I approve of what you said.
> We don't have divergence about the difference between "sf probe" and "sf
> info".
> I just want to emphasize that "sf probe" re-identify the device, create
> a new "spi_flash" and print the info, "sf info" only print the current info.
>>
>> BTW: regarding this patch, unlike any command in u-boot (for my
>> understanding)
>> sf probe has a run-time capable detection option based on bus:cs hz mode
>> from user. So it better to skip the re-identify the same fitlash if
>> the flash is identified before
>> in sf probe logic and try to print the info in it instead of going
>> another stale command just
>> by doing print using earlier commands settings (sf probe).
>>
> I think we get to a common view that it is unnecessary to re-identify
> the device if it has been identified.
> Divergence is that you think this should be completed through updating
> the sf probe logic and I think we should add the new command "sf info".
> "sf info" resolves the problem in a more simpler way.
> User will be more clearly about the functions of the sf commands if we
> add a new command "sf info".
> From the literal meaning of the command "sf probe" should identify the
> device and the command "sf info" show the information of current device.
Yes, I agree that 'sf info' simply show the current device info in a
simpler way.
But, being with my previous statement it simply print the info which
is derived from
'sf probe' So why should we go and do the same thing in 'sf probe'
with increasing
one more command which does part of same as before.
Yes, 'sf probe' is doing unnecessary re-identify the device so may be we can
fix that, ie going to be a real fix other than adding new command.
Please think in that direction, adding new command in u-boot is really a big
step to think in whole u-boot development point of view.
>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In case of using DM SPI, if we disable CONFIG_DM_DEVICE_REMOVE "sf
>>>>>>>> probe" will
>>>>>>>> only call the flash driver's probe function the first time you run it
>>>>>>>> and no
>>>>>>>> information will show after the first. It is recommended that only
>>>>>>>> call the
>>>>>>>> flash driver's probe function once during u-boot period. You can get
>>>>>>>> the debug
>>>>>>>> information using "sf info" in this case.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Changes in v1: None.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> common/cmd_sf.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I wonder if you should enable this command only when driver model is
>>>>>>> used?
>>>>>> You mean I should only enable it when driver model is used?
>>>>>> I think it is also useful in NO-DM model.
>>>>>> We can get the device information without data transfer using this
>>>>>> command.
>>>>>
>>>>> OK.
>>>>>
>>>>> Acked-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>> Wang Haikun
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> diff --git a/common/cmd_sf.c b/common/cmd_sf.c
>>>>>>>> index 6aabf39..38841fa 100644
>>>>>>>> --- a/common/cmd_sf.c
>>>>>>>> +++ b/common/cmd_sf.c
>>>>>>>> @@ -503,6 +503,44 @@ static int do_spi_flash_test(int argc, char *
>>>>>>>> const argv[])
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>> #endif /* CONFIG_CMD_SF_TEST */
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +static int do_spi_flash_info(struct spi_flash *flash, bool
>>>>>>>> dm_column_style)
>>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>>> + if (dm_column_style) {
>>>>>>>> + struct udevice *bus;
>>>>>>>> + struct udevice *dev;
>>>>>>>> + struct dm_spi_slave_platdata *plat;
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> + dev = flash->dev;
>>>>>>>> + bus = dev->parent;
>>>>>>>> + plat = dev_get_parent_platdata(dev);
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> + printf("Device: %s\n", dev->name);
>>>>>>>> + printf("Chipselect: %d\n", plat->cs);
>>>>>>>> + printf("Bind Driver: %s\n", dev->driver->name);
>>>>>>>> + printf("SPI bus: %s\n", bus->name);
>>>>>>>> + printf("SPI bus number: %d\n", bus->seq);
>>>>>>>> + printf("Flash type: %s\n", flash->name);
>>>>>>>> + printf("Page size: ");
>>>>>>>> + print_size(flash->page_size, "\n");
>>>>>>>> + printf("Erase size: ");
>>>>>>>> + print_size(flash->erase_size, "\n");
>>>>>>>> + printf("Total size: ");
>>>>>>>> + print_size(flash->size, "\n");
>>>>>>>> + if (flash->memory_map)
>>>>>>>> + printf("Mapped at %p\n", flash->memory_map);
>>>>>>>> + } else {
>>>>>>>> + printf("SF: Detected %s with page size ", flash->name);
>>>>>>>> + print_size(flash->page_size, ", erase size ");
>>>>>>>> + print_size(flash->erase_size, ", total ");
>>>>>>>> + print_size(flash->size, "");
>>>>>>>> + if (flash->memory_map)
>>>>>>>> + printf(", mapped at %p", flash->memory_map);
>>>>>>>> + puts("\n");
>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> + return 0;
>>>>>>>> +}
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> static int do_spi_flash(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, int argc,
>>>>>>>> char * const argv[])
>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>> @@ -537,6 +575,8 @@ static int do_spi_flash(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int
>>>>>>>> flag, int argc,
>>>>>>>> else if (!strcmp(cmd, "test"))
>>>>>>>> ret = do_spi_flash_test(argc, argv);
>>>>>>>> #endif
>>>>>>>> + else if (!strcmp(cmd, "info"))
>>>>>>>> + ret = do_spi_flash_info(flash,
>>>>>>>> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DM_SPI_FLASH));
>>>>>>>> else
>>>>>>>> ret = -1;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> @@ -567,6 +607,7 @@ U_BOOT_CMD(
>>>>>>>> "sf erase offset [+]len - erase `len' bytes from
>>>>>>>> `offset'\n"
>>>>>>>> " `+len' round up `len' to
>>>>>>>> block size\n"
>>>>>>>> "sf update addr offset len - erase and write `len'
>>>>>>>> bytes from memory\n"
>>>>>>>> - " at `addr' to flash at
>>>>>>>> `offset'"
>>>>>>>> + " at `addr' to flash at
>>>>>>>> `offset'\n"
>>>>>>>> + "sf info - display info of the current SPI Flash device\n"
>>>>>>>> SF_TEST_HELP
>>>>>>>> );
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> 2.1.0.27.g96db324
thanks!
--
Jagan Teki,
Openedev.
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
