Hi. Sorry for my late reply.
2015-04-24 0:38 GMT+09:00 York Sun <york...@freescale.com>: > Resend with corrected email address. > > +Masahiro Yamada > > On 04/23/2015 01:27 AM, Liu Shengzhou-B36685 wrote: >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Sun York-R58495 >>> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 3:22 AM >>> To: Liu Shengzhou-B36685; u-boot@lists.denx.de >>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] powerpc/t1023rdb: Add T1023 RDB board support >>> >>> On 03/27/2015 12:48 AM, Shengzhou Liu wrote: >>>> T1023RDB is a Freescale Reference Design Board that hosts the T1023 SoC. >>>> >>>> +++ b/configs/T1023RDB_NAND_defconfig >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ >>>> +CONFIG_SPL=y >>>> +CONFIG_SYS_EXTRA_OPTIONS="PPC_T1023,T1023RDB,RAMBOOT_PBL,SPL_FSL_PBL,NAND" >>>> ++S:CONFIG_PPC=y >>>> ++S:CONFIG_MPC85xx=y >>>> ++S:CONFIG_TARGET_T102XRDB=y >>> >>> Please do not use CONFIG_SYS_EXTRA_OPTIONS for new boards. >>> >>> York >> >> I noted "config SYS_EXTRA_OPTIONS string "Extra Options (DEPRECATED)" in >> Kconfig. >> But we still have to use the CONFIG_SYS_EXTRA_OPTIONS in current >> configuration >> Infrastructure, unless a newer approach is available in future. >> >> Because there are some something like 'SPL_FSL_PBL', 'NAND', >> 'SPIFLASH''SDCARD' which must be >> defined dynamically during build u-boot for various boot-mode in those >> *_defconfig files >> instead of in static include/config.h > > I was thinking to use "select" in Kconfig. But as you said, there are some > macros not standardized. Maybe it is too early to enforce that. Let's hear > from > Masahiro Yamada. > As you notice, many macros are missing from Kconfig, so we can not ban SYS_EXTRA_OPTIONS yet. -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
