On Monday, April 13, 2015 at 03:36:56 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Hi Marek, > > On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 8:28 PM, Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote: > > I was concerned about the placement of the PHY reg definition. I didn't > > hear from Fabio on the result of this decision and I don't really mind > > that either way. > > I thought that maybe we should relax about the 'register access via > offset is forbidden' rule for new code submission, as according to Tom > he would like to see this going away in the future: > https://www.marc.info/?l=u-boot&m=142609602127309&w=2
Hi, OK, I'm fine with that. But this discussion is not about the register access, but about placing register definition which is common to three different SoC families into the correct place. Did I miss something please ? Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
