Robin Getz a écrit : > On Thu 2 Jul 2009 09:56, Richard Stallman pondered: >> This clause is not an exception to the requirement for installation >> information. Cell phones must offer installation information just like >> other User Products. > > Right - but the cell phone provider should have the ability to alter the > state > of the device (not allow the radio to be turned on), so it can't "adversely > affects the operation of the network" - shouldn't they? > > Or is this where one person's freedom (the ability to modify their phone, and > turn it into a jamming device), is more important than the freedom of > everyone else to actually use their phones on the same network. (Which > actually - wouldn't be a completely bad idea - when I have been standing near > someone talking too loud into their phone in a public place, I often wish for > a jam the network app on my phone :)
An operator can only deny the access to his network. It can't *legaly* modify the user device without the user agreement. A user is *technically* free to modify a device to do what he want. But it can't *legaly* emit a signal not in conformance to the relevant regulations. There is a lot of them in the case of the a GSM/3G device: http://www.3gpp.mobi/specifications Jean-Christian de Rivaz _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
