On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 12:35:41PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 02/16/2015 06:03 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > >On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 12:16:15PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: > > > >>USB doesn't seem to work yet; the controller detects the on-board Hub/ > >>Ethernet device but can't read the descriptors from it. I haven't > >>investigated yet. > >> > >>Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swar...@wwwdotorg.org> > >>--- > >>v3: Rebased on top of u-boot-dm merge. > >>v2: Implement new board_rev decoding scheme, to avoid hard-coding the > >>board revision onthe RPi 2. > > > >+(rpi_2) make[3]: *** No rule to make target > >`arch/arm/cpu/armv7/bcm2835/../../arm1176/bcm2835//init.o', needed by > >`arch/arm/cpu/armv7/bcm2835/built-in.o'. Stop. > >+(rpi_2) make[2]: *** [arch/arm/cpu/armv7/bcm2835] Error 2 > >+(rpi_2) make[1]: *** [arch/arm/cpu/armv7] Error 2 > > > >When I try and build it with buildman. Something get left out > >somewhere? Thanks! > > I've reproduced this error on my machine at work, where I previously > worked out the right stuff to put into ~/.buildman. > > Now that I try the regular build process (in-tree build using just > make) multiple times after a "git clean -f -d -x" , I see the same > error that way too, sometimes, so it's nothing to do with buildman. > > However, I don't always get the error with either plain make or with > buildman, and it doesn't always complain about the same file: > > >+make[1]: *** No rule to make target `arch//cpu/u-boot.lds', needed by > >`u-boot.lds'. Stop. > > >+make[3]: *** No rule to make target > >`arch/arm/cpu/armv7/bcm2835/../../arm1176/bcm2835//init.o', needed by > >`arch/arm/cpu/armv7/bcm2835/built-in.o'. Stop. > > This isn't anything to do with these patches; I can see the exact > same issue building the following existing boards in unmodified > u-boot/master: > > rpi (arm1176, no SPL) > tnetv107x_evm_defconfigs (arm1176 no SPL) > mx35pdk_defconfig (arm1136, no SPL) > nhk8815_defconfig (arm926ejs, no SPL) > imx27lite_defconfig (arm926ejs, SPL) > vexpress_ca15_tc2_defconfig (ARMv7, no SPL) > > Strangely I don't see the issue for: > > seaboard (ARMv7, SPL) > maxbcm_defconfig (ARMv7, SPL) > > I wonder if bisecting would show up where this issue was introduced.
I bet it will and I bet it's when we switch to Kconfig. Masahiro, any ideas? -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
