On Mon, 2014-10-06 at 10:37 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 10/04/2014 10:37 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 17:05 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > >> None of the known sunxi devices actually use mmc1 routed through PH, where > >> as some devices do actually use mmc1 routed through PG, so change the > >> routing > >> of mmc1 to PG. If in the future we encounter devices with mmc1 routed > >> through > >> PH, we will need to change things to be a bit more flexible. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com> > > > > Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campb...@citrix.com> > > > > Although it seems that adding a Kconfig choice option would only be a > > dozen or so lines of pretty trivial stuff if we wanted to do it now. > > This mostly seems to be a sun4i/sun7i vs sun5i thing. mmc1 could be routed > through PH on sun4i/sun7i, but actually is never used there, as PH typically > is used for gpio purposed on sun4i/sun7i, where as on sun5i (which has way > less pins), mmc1 goes out on PG, and actually is used as such there. > > I have considered keeping the old pinmux settings using #if defined SUN5I > for the new ones, but since the old ones are never used just replacing > them seems better.
Sure. Ian. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
