On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 11:01:21AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On 3 June 2014 10:59, Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 07:11:14PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > >> Hi Tom, > >> > >> On 24 May 2014 06:21, Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com> wrote: > >> > >> > On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 03:57:34PM -1000, Simon Glass wrote: > > [snip] > >> > > It surprises me the lengths to which people are going to try to > >> > > shoehorn .dtbs, compression, multiple dtbs, multi-arch etc. into the > >> > > kenel zImage format. The decompression header is ugly, plus it is > >> > > slower than doing these things in U-Boot. > >> > > >> > Well, with arm64 the kernel is just getting out of the business, hence > >> > booti (or however we add Image support) and not do the zImage dance. > >> > >> Does this mean a clean Image with no add-ons? > > > > Yes, Image only, and different from arch/arm/boot/Image. Leaving the > > details of how to find/place the device tree and initrd up to the > > bootloader. > > That sounds promising. So no more decompression / serial UART / > cache-enable header?
For the time being, yes. We'll see what happens when more people are using real hardware rather than simulator and not the boot-wrapper tool. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
