On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 07:11:14PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On 24 May 2014 06:21, Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 03:57:34PM -1000, Simon Glass wrote: [snip] > > > It surprises me the lengths to which people are going to try to > > > shoehorn .dtbs, compression, multiple dtbs, multi-arch etc. into the > > > kenel zImage format. The decompression header is ugly, plus it is > > > slower than doing these things in U-Boot. > > > > Well, with arm64 the kernel is just getting out of the business, hence > > booti (or however we add Image support) and not do the zImage dance. > > Does this mean a clean Image with no add-ons?
Yes, Image only, and different from arch/arm/boot/Image. Leaving the details of how to find/place the device tree and initrd up to the bootloader. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
