Hi Tom, On 3 June 2014 10:59, Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 07:11:14PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: >> Hi Tom, >> >> On 24 May 2014 06:21, Tom Rini <tr...@ti.com> wrote: >> >> > On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 03:57:34PM -1000, Simon Glass wrote: > [snip] >> > > It surprises me the lengths to which people are going to try to >> > > shoehorn .dtbs, compression, multiple dtbs, multi-arch etc. into the >> > > kenel zImage format. The decompression header is ugly, plus it is >> > > slower than doing these things in U-Boot. >> > >> > Well, with arm64 the kernel is just getting out of the business, hence >> > booti (or however we add Image support) and not do the zImage dance. >> >> Does this mean a clean Image with no add-ons? > > Yes, Image only, and different from arch/arm/boot/Image. Leaving the > details of how to find/place the device tree and initrd up to the > bootloader.
That sounds promising. So no more decompression / serial UART / cache-enable header? Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
