On 3/30/2014 7:52 AM, Marek Vasut wrote: > On Sunday, March 30, 2014 at 12:04:31 AM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Troy Kisky >> >> <troy.ki...@boundarydevices.com> wrote: >>> This removes one block in the move toward 1 u-boot >>> for both a mx6q (quad) and mx6dl (duallite) processor. >>> >>> Now fdt_file hardcoded value can be removed. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky <troy.ki...@boundarydevices.com> >> >> Nice! I do think it is in the right direction. I will give it a try soon... > > Full NAK on this patch, I completely agree with Eric that this approach is > totally wrong. This adds stuff which should be pulled from DT into common > code, > this is just NAK. > > Best regards, > Marek Vasut >
I am not sure what you are suggesting. Don't you have an chicken and egg problem? Troy _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
