On Wednesday, February 12, 2014 at 02:11:23 PM, Stefano Babic wrote: > Hi Marek, > > On 12/02/2014 08:49, Marek Vasut wrote: > >> Anyway, I think the discussion is a bit away from which is the best > >> image. IMHO the board maintainer can decide which is the more suitable > >> default environment he needs > > > > So, do we now accept new built-in environment changes again? > > My good point to refuse them was that Simon's patches to move built-in > environment to a .env file are quite ready to be merged. I will be happy > if they can find the way to go in, as they can clean up the whole mess > we have. Checking only the i.MXes boards, most CONFIG_EXTRA_ENV_SETTINGS > are cut&paste from other boards, with some minor changes making them > inconsistent. The good exception are the sabre boards, because they use > the same common file. > > I am taking a look if we can at least guarantee that all these boards > can have the same built-in environment, because it seems clear that > this is what we want to reach. > > > I will re-submit my > > changes to the default environment for the boards I maintain if you don't > > mind then. > > I cannot refuse them, I cannot (yet) offer a good alternative. Send them.
Good. I will send them when ELDK 5.5 is out, by that time they will be final. > > Also, I don't see Otavio being the maintainer of most of these boards. > > True, but maintainers (Fabio, Alison) were informed in CC. The patchset > is quite a month old and I had to decide myself if there is a good > reason to reject them - I cannot find it. Were the patches ACKed by either of them ? There was simply no activity, which does not look like a good enough reason to accept patches ... Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
