Hi Marek, On 12/02/2014 08:49, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> >> Anyway, I think the discussion is a bit away from which is the best >> image. IMHO the board maintainer can decide which is the more suitable >> default environment he needs > > So, do we now accept new built-in environment changes again? My good point to refuse them was that Simon's patches to move built-in environment to a .env file are quite ready to be merged. I will be happy if they can find the way to go in, as they can clean up the whole mess we have. Checking only the i.MXes boards, most CONFIG_EXTRA_ENV_SETTINGS are cut&paste from other boards, with some minor changes making them inconsistent. The good exception are the sabre boards, because they use the same common file. I am taking a look if we can at least guarantee that all these boards can have the same built-in environment, because it seems clear that this is what we want to reach. > I will re-submit my > changes to the default environment for the boards I maintain if you don't > mind > then. I cannot refuse them, I cannot (yet) offer a good alternative. Send them. > > Also, I don't see Otavio being the maintainer of most of these boards. True, but maintainers (Fabio, Alison) were informed in CC. The patchset is quite a month old and I had to decide myself if there is a good reason to reject them - I cannot find it. Best regards, Stefano Babic -- ===================================================================== DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-53 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: sba...@denx.de ===================================================================== _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
