Hi Marek, On 11/02/2014 14:15, Marek Vasut wrote: > On Thursday, January 16, 2014 at 11:14:44 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> Dear Otavio Salvador, >> >> In message <1389909486-12880-1-git-send-email-ota...@ossystems.com.br> you > wrote: >>> This patchset does as stated in the subject. It has been build tested >> >>> as can be seen below: >> What is the motivation for this change? Using zImage is - from the >> technical point of view - the poorest of the available choices. If >> you are not happy with using uImages, then why do you not move forward >> and use FIT images? > > I see the patchset was applied, but this question was not answered.
I have not seen the question, sorry. Rather patchwork did not show me the right thread, as it showed me only the comments for Patches 1-11 :-( Anyway, I think the discussion is a bit away from which is the best image. IMHO the board maintainer can decide which is the more suitable default environment he needs, and in this case, he decided for a "raw image" like zimage. We can argument which is the best one as on the ARM ML, but I have no other arguments to block such kind of patches. I am missing Simon's patches to move the "default" environment outside of the configuration file: I can imagine that using different ".env" can solve part of the problems we have with CONFIG_EXTRA_ENV_SETTINGS, that is become more and more complex, and can help to fine tuning the default environment. Best regards, Stefano Babic -- ===================================================================== DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-53 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: sba...@denx.de ===================================================================== _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
