On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 9:21 PM, Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de> wrote:
> On Monday, January 06, 2014 at 10:29:40 AM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>> Add required support to use multiple USB 3.0 controllers available
>> on exynos5420 SoC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <gautam.vi...@samsung.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/power.c | 18 ++++--
>> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/cpu.h | 10 ++++
>> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/power.h | 2 +-
>> drivers/usb/host/xhci-exynos5.c | 91
>> +++++++++++++++++++++--------- drivers/usb/host/xhci.c |
>> 4 --
>> drivers/usb/host/xhci.h | 4 ++
>> 6 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/power.c
>> b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/power.c index 563abd7..0f8aa98 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/power.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/power.c
>> @@ -59,26 +59,34 @@ void set_usbhost_phy_ctrl(unsigned int enable)
>> exynos5_set_usbhost_phy_ctrl(enable);
>> }
>>
>> -static void exynos5_set_usbdrd_phy_ctrl(unsigned int enable)
>> +static void exynos5_set_usbdrd_phy_ctrl(unsigned int enable, int
>> dev_index) {
>> struct exynos5_power *power =
>> (struct exynos5_power *)samsung_get_base_power();
>>
>> + /*
>> + * Assuming here that the DRD_PHY_CONTROL registers
>> + * are contiguous, so that :
>> + * addressof(DRD_PHY1_CONTROL) = addressof(DRD_PHY_CONTROL) + 0x4;
>> + * which is the case with exynos5420.
>> + * For exynos5250 this should work out of box, since dev_index will
>> + * always be '0' in that case
>> + */
>
> Why don't you convert the entry for usbdrd_phy_control into an array in the
> 'struct exynos5_power' structure instead ? Then you could index it with
> dev_index.
Aah, i should have been more careful here. There's already a structure
available for exynos5420 "exynos5420_power",
which i can use. I just would need to use api "proid_is_exynos5420()"
or "proid_is_exynos5250()" to differentiate between
the two.
>
> [...]
>
> Do you think it'd be possible to split this patch into drivers/usb/ specific
> part and CPU-specific part ? I'd like to see that to prevent merge conflicts.
Ok, i'll separate out the two parts.
>
> [...]
>
> Best regards,
> Marek Vasut
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot mailing list
> U-Boot@lists.denx.de
> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
--
Best Regards
Vivek Gautam
Samsung R&D Institute, Bangalore
India
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
