Is this patch ok for inclusion?
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Jon <jonsm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Sascha Hauer <s.ha...@pengutronix.de>
>
> Do not initialize phy on startup, instead initialize it
> when we actually need it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.ha...@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> drivers/net/mpc5xxx_fec.c | 11 +++++++++--
> 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/mpc5xxx_fec.c b/drivers/net/mpc5xxx_fec.c
> index 0f1d1af..1876b76 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/mpc5xxx_fec.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/mpc5xxx_fec.c
> @@ -42,6 +42,8 @@ typedef struct {
> int fec5xxx_miiphy_read(char *devname, uint8 phyAddr, uint8 regAddr, uint16
> * retVal);
> int fec5xxx_miiphy_write(char *devname, uint8 phyAddr, uint8 regAddr, uint16
> data);
>
> +static int mpc5xxx_fec_init_phy(struct eth_device *dev, bd_t * bis);
> +
> /********************************************************************/
> #if (DEBUG & 0x2)
> static void mpc5xxx_fec_phydump (char *devname)
> @@ -249,6 +251,8 @@ static int mpc5xxx_fec_init(struct eth_device *dev, bd_t
> * bis)
> printf ("mpc5xxx_fec_init... Begin\n");
> #endif
>
> + mpc5xxx_fec_init_phy(dev, bis);
> +
> /*
> * Initialize RxBD/TxBD rings
> */
> @@ -387,6 +391,11 @@ static int mpc5xxx_fec_init_phy(struct eth_device *dev,
> bd_t * bis)
> {
> mpc5xxx_fec_priv *fec = (mpc5xxx_fec_priv *)dev->priv;
> const uint8 phyAddr = CONFIG_PHY_ADDR; /* Only one PHY */
> + static int initialized = 0;
> +
> + if(initialized)
> + return 0;
> + initialized = 1;
>
> #if (DEBUG & 0x1)
> printf ("mpc5xxx_fec_init_phy... Begin\n");
> @@ -937,8 +946,6 @@ int mpc5xxx_fec_initialize(bd_t * bis)
> mpc5xxx_fec_set_hwaddr(fec, env_enetaddr);
> }
>
> - mpc5xxx_fec_init_phy(dev, bis);
> -
> return 1;
> }
>
>
>
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
