Hi Eric,
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:24 PM, Eric Nelson
<eric.nel...@boundarydevices.com> wrote:
> Since this convention is shared among at least SABRE Lite, SABRE SD,
> Nitrogen6x and Wandboard, wouldn't a weak function in imx-common/cpu.c
> be a better choice?
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_REVISION_TAG
> +u32 __weak get_board_rev(void)
> +{
> + return get_cpu_rev();
> +}
> +#endif
>
> Then boards could override things, but will do the reasonable thing
> without the extra code.
I like this idea. Will submit this change with the get_cpu_rev()
tomorrow, after I get more comments on the proposed get_cpu_rev patch.
Thanks,
Fabio Estevam
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
