Hi Eric, On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Eric Nelson <eric.nel...@boundarydevices.com> wrote:
> At the moment, it doesn't. > > I would really like to see us (the i.MX6 community) standardize > the use of some fuses to specifically mean board revision. > > We're contemplating some board changes such as switching the > ethernet PHY and having a convention for the use of a few > bits in OTP would allow us to implement get_board_rev() once in > a common place. > > Over the lifetime of most boards, it's likely that at least > one board revision will have software implications and having > a common way to express/detect this could prevent some churn > in board-specific files. > > Such a convention would need to have broad sign off though. > > Let me know your thoughts on the subject. Would this approach work? http://git.freescale.com/git/cgit.cgi/imx/uboot-imx.git/tree/board/freescale/common/fsl_sys_rev.c?h=imx_v2009.08_3.0.0 Regards, Fabio Estevam _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
