On 20:02-20130313, Koen Kooi wrote:
>
> Op 13 mrt. 2013, om 16:07 heeft Nishanth Menon <n...@ti.com> het volgende
> geschreven:
>
> > On 16:05-20130313, Koen Kooi wrote:
> >>
> >> Op 13 mrt. 2013, om 16:02 heeft Nishanth Menon <n...@ti.com> het volgende
> >> geschreven:
> >>
> >>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Koen Kooi <k...@dominion.thruhere.net>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Op 13 mrt. 2013, om 15:35 heeft Nishanth Menon <n...@ti.com> het
> >>>> volgende geschreven:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 10:20-20130313, Tom Rini wrote:
> >>>>>> From: Koen Kooi <k...@dominion.thruhere.net>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi <k...@dominion.thruhere.net>
> >>>>>> Acked-by: Peter Korsgaard <jac...@sunsite.dk>
> >>>>>> ---
> >>>>>> include/configs/am335x_evm.h | 2 ++
> >>>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> diff --git a/include/configs/am335x_evm.h
> >>>>>> b/include/configs/am335x_evm.h
> >>>>>> index 33ee2c4..abf4e39 100644
> >>>>>> --- a/include/configs/am335x_evm.h
> >>>>>> +++ b/include/configs/am335x_evm.h
> >>>>>> @@ -87,6 +87,8 @@
> >>>>>> "findfdt="\
> >>>>>> "if test $board_name = A335BONE; then " \
> >>>>>> "setenv fdtfile am335x-bone.dtb; fi; " \
> >>>>>> + "if test $board_name = A335BNLT; then " \
> >>>>>> + "setenv fdtfile am335x-bonelt.dtb; fi; " \
> >>>>> could we not use am335x-boneblack.dtb instead?
> >>>>
> >>>> it's bonelt in the kernel, so boneblack would fail to load a dtb
> >>> $ git describe
> >>> v3.9-rc2
> >>> $ ls arch/arm/boot/dts/*bone*.dts*
> >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/am335x-bone.dts
> >>> ???
> >>
> >> What a surprise, missing stuff in mainline! It's present in the vendor
> >> kernel, which is what is shipping with the board.
> > No surprise there as marketing names are finalized close to product
> > launches. If there is an vendor u-boot, it can remain in sync with what
> > ever the vendor kernel is. If it is upstream, we might want to think
> > longterm.
>
> I'm in charge of pushing the am335x-bonelt.dts upstream to Linus and I'd like
> to keep everything in sync. I'm not fond of renaming it again, the EEPROM
> says BNLT, not BNB :)
:) I will leave it at EEPROM entry defining what the file name should be
and if it is not same as product's official name, guess it is some one's
future explanation burden ;)
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
