Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,
In message <1236089265-24598-8-git-send-email-plagn...@jcrosoft.com> you wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagn...@jcrosoft.com>
> ---
> Makefile | 11 +++++++++++
> include/configs/at91sam9263ek.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> index 784af52..50ce78e 100644
> --- a/Makefile
> +++ b/Makefile
> @@ -2687,6 +2687,8 @@ at91sam9261ek_config : unconfig
> at91sam9263ek_nandflash_config \
> at91sam9263ek_dataflash_config \
> at91sam9263ek_dataflash_cs0_config \
> +at91sam9263ek_dcc_multi_config \
> +at91sam9263ek_dcc_config \
> at91sam9263ek_wdt_config \
> at91sam9263ek_config : unconfig
NAK. NAK. NAK.
As explained before, this makes no sense. Why could we not have DCC
support with any of the other options?
Also, you are adding more and more cruft to the Makefile. This is not
acceptable.
Finally, there should be some commit message that explains what you
are doing. For example, you should at least give a minimal
explanation what DCC is and why we might want to add this....
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de
You can't evaluate a man by logic alone.
-- McCoy, "I, Mudd", stardate 4513.3
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
