Stefan Roese wrote: > On Tuesday 17 February 2009, Felix Radensky wrote: > >>>> 2. Another problem is that in bootstrap configuration B (CPU - 333 Mhz, >>>> PLB 166MHz) >>>> PCI-E cards are not recognized in any slot. This happens with all >>>> u-boot versions I've >>>> tested. Linux also does not recognize PCI-E cards. Kilauea board >>>> manual says that PCI >>>> clock is determined by CPLD. Could it be CPLD/FPGA bug ? >>>> >>> Is bootstrap option C working? >>> >> No, C doesn't work either. The card I'm testing with is Intel Gigabit >> Ethernet adapter (PRO/1000 PT 1x) >> > > Perhaps its only working with the I2C bootstrap settings. Could be that one > (or more) register values are configured via the I2C bootstrap EEPROM > compared to the hardwired bootstrap option. Please check the users manual and > compare the register settings of I2C bootstrap option H to option B or C. > >
I did some more tests, and have found the following: 1. When system powers up in bootstrap option B or C u-boot does not detect PCI-E device PCI: Bus Dev VenId DevId Class Int PCIE0: link is not up. PCIE0: initialization as root-complex failed PCIE1: link is not up. PCIE1: initialization as root-complex failed 2. Linux detects PCI-E device, but does not detect the link: PCIE1: Checking link... PCIE1: Device detected, waiting for link... PCIE1: Link up failed 3. If I execute reboot from linux, u-boot now detects the device PCI: Bus Dev VenId DevId Class Int PCIE0: link is not up. PCIE0: initialization as root-complex failed PCIE1: successfully set as root-complex 01 00 8086 10b9 0200 00 4. After that Linux detects both device and link PCIE1: Checking link... PCIE1: Device detected, waiting for link... PCIE1: link is up ! -bash-3.2# lspci 0000:00:00.0 PCI bridge: Unknown device aaa0:bed0 (rev 01) 0001:40:00.0 PCI bridge: Unknown device aaa1:bed1 (rev 01) 0001:41:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82572EI Gigabit Ethernet Controller (Copper) (rev 06) Also, I've compared the values of SDR0_SDSTP0-SDR0_SDSTP3 registers in bootstrap options C and H and didn't find anything suspicious. There are differences in various divisor values, but that is expected. Tested with u-boot 2009.03-rc1 and linux-2.6.29-rc5 Any other ideas ? Thanks a lot. Felix. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot