Apologies...editing while on a call. On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Steve Waterbury <water...@pangalactic.us> wrote: > On 06/23/2015 03:31 PM, Jason J. W. Williams wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:59 AM, David Reid <dr...@dreid.org> wrote: >>> >>> I'm going to come out strongly against using the PSF CoC. It is woefully >>> inadequate, it includes no mechanisms for reporting, and as any PSF >>> member >>> who has been on certain mailing lists knows it is actually completely >>> unenforceable. >> >> >> Enforcing CoCs is hard, and to that end I don't think adding a section >> to the PSF CoC indicating who will act as arbiter for enforcement and >> what the stages of remediation available to the arbiters are. > > > With all due respect ;), that is not a well-formed sentence ... > this part of it: > > "adding a section > to the PSF CoC indicating who will act as arbiter for enforcement and > what the stages of remediation available to the arbiters are" > > is a noun phrase. So you said "I don't think [noun phrase]." > I suspect you want to say "I don't think [noun phrase] would be > difficult." ... or something like that. > > Steve > > > _______________________________________________ > Twisted-Python mailing list > Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com > http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
_______________________________________________ Twisted-Python mailing list Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
