On 06/23/2015 03:31 PM, Jason J. W. Williams wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:59 AM, David Reid <dr...@dreid.org> wrote:
I'm going to come out strongly against using the PSF CoC. It is woefully
inadequate, it includes no mechanisms for reporting, and as any PSF member
who has been on certain mailing lists knows it is actually completely
unenforceable.
Enforcing CoCs is hard, and to that end I don't think adding a section
to the PSF CoC indicating who will act as arbiter for enforcement and
what the stages of remediation available to the arbiters are.
With all due respect ;), that is not a well-formed sentence ...
this part of it:
"adding a section
to the PSF CoC indicating who will act as arbiter for enforcement and
what the stages of remediation available to the arbiters are"
is a noun phrase. So you said "I don't think [noun phrase]."
I suspect you want to say "I don't think [noun phrase] would be
difficult." ... or something like that.
Steve
_______________________________________________
Twisted-Python mailing list
Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com
http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
