On 08:27 am, j...@mumak.net wrote:
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 2:42 AM, Glyph Lefkowitz
<gl...@twistedmatrix.com> wrote:
On Dec 8, 2009, at 4:50 AM, Jonathan Lange wrote:
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 10:35 AM, �<exar...@twistedmatrix.com> wrote:
On 09:10 pm, j...@mumak.net wrote:
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 6:29 AM, �<exar...@twistedmatrix.com> wrote:
On 09:26 am, j...@mumak.net wrote:
A while ago at EuroPython, Mikeal Rogers and I talked about
Deferreds
and how they don't really depend on the rest of Twisted.
However, if I were the maintainer, I think that I would like
Twisted
to depend on this code, dropping its own Deferred implementation.
It would be pretty neat to be able to do that. I don't think it
will happen
unless someone is actively working towards it, though.
If there's in principal agreement, I can laconically work towards it.
In (ahem) principle, I agree,
I can't believe I got that wrong. Sorry.
but my agreement is contingent upon the theoretical existence of
things like "a good package manager for Python" and "installation
instructions on our website which clearly explain how to install
dependencies in a context-sensitive manner" (i.e. depending on your
platform).
I'm with you on the installation instructions. Why this should block
on a good package manager for Python?
Probably it shouldn't, if we ever actually want it to happen. We can
distribute the top-level deferred package with Twisted when we actually
get to that point.
Jean-Paul
_______________________________________________
Twisted-Python mailing list
Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com
http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
