On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 10:35 AM,  <exar...@twistedmatrix.com> wrote:
> On 09:10 pm, j...@mumak.net wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 6:29 AM,  <exar...@twistedmatrix.com> wrote:
>>> On 09:26 am, j...@mumak.net wrote:
>>>>
>>>> A while ago at EuroPython, Mikeal Rogers and I talked about Deferreds
>>>> and how they don't really depend on the rest of Twisted. Later, Mikeal
>>>> made a branch that extracted Deferred out of the rest of Twisted, and
>>>> I contributed a patch to make it more correct.
>>>>
...
>>>
>>> I think this is a good idea, except you didn't mention anything about
>>> the plan for keeping this separate codebase synchronized with Twisted
>>> development.  I hope the plan isn't to allow it to become out of date.
>>
...
>> However, if I were the maintainer, I think that I would like Twisted
>> to depend on this code, dropping its own Deferred implementation.
>
> It would be pretty neat to be able to do that.  I don't think it will happen
> unless someone is actively working towards it, though.
>

If there's in principal agreement, I can laconically work towards it.

jml

_______________________________________________
Twisted-Python mailing list
Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com
http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python

Reply via email to