On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 2:42 AM, Glyph Lefkowitz <gl...@twistedmatrix.com> wrote: > > On Dec 8, 2009, at 4:50 AM, Jonathan Lange wrote: > >> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 10:35 AM, <exar...@twistedmatrix.com> wrote: >>> On 09:10 pm, j...@mumak.net wrote: >>>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 6:29 AM, <exar...@twistedmatrix.com> wrote: >>>>> On 09:26 am, j...@mumak.net wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> A while ago at EuroPython, Mikeal Rogers and I talked about Deferreds >>>>>> and how they don't really depend on the rest of Twisted. > >>>> However, if I were the maintainer, I think that I would like Twisted >>>> to depend on this code, dropping its own Deferred implementation. >>> >>> It would be pretty neat to be able to do that. I don't think it will happen >>> unless someone is actively working towards it, though. > >> If there's in principal agreement, I can laconically work towards it. > > In (ahem) principle, I agree,
I can't believe I got that wrong. Sorry. >but my agreement is contingent upon the theoretical existence of things like >"a good package manager for Python" and "installation instructions on our >website which clearly explain how to install dependencies in a >context-sensitive manner" (i.e. depending on your platform). I'm with you on the installation instructions. Why this should block on a good package manager for Python? > So, I would regard this as a long-term goal. Given the pace of our normal, > non-"laconic" work, though, I think there's little risk it will be completed > in the near term ;-). I completely screwed up with the advanced English usage then. :( jml _______________________________________________ Twisted-Python mailing list Twisted-Python@twistedmatrix.com http://twistedmatrix.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twisted-python
