Hello 2016-12-04 20:39 GMT-05:00 Cédric Krier <[email protected]>:
> On 2016-12-04 12:04, Carlos Eduardo Sotelo Pinto wrote: > > *-- Parties on tryton let to add more than one identifier, that makes me > a > > legal issue on a before implementation that I have done, since **tax > > autority said it must not be done on this way because each party must > have > > just one identifier an no more than one.* > > I can not believe you that tax authorities have requirement on how a > software should be designed. > I have never said that!!! What I have said is , there is no a way to manage indetifiers on this way: - a Code - a Description name *CODE| Description * ================================== * 0 | DOC.TRIB.NO.DOM.SIN.RUC * 1 | DOC. NACIONAL DE IDENTIDAD * 4 | CARNET DE EXTRANJERIA * 6 | REG. UNICO DE CONTRIBUYENTES * 7 | PASAPORTE * A | CED. DIPLOMATICA DE IDENTIDAD If identifiers has no a way to manage identifiers on this way, then software doesnt work. just that, simple, since repots need that codification, reports dont need names, reports need the *Code on Reports* But is no legal having this: - Many identifiers per party, this screen was observed. I have fixed it on the implementartion, but on custom modules, anyway, the software doesnt fill restrictions. > I can not see how what you describe can be a legal issue. Of course if a > party can be assigned only one of those numbers by the authorities, > there are no reason you magically enter more than one. > > Yes you are right!! but users, if the user makes a mistake, could get into a legal issue and get more than USD 1000.00 on penalties for a user mistake ( sometimes is no a mistake and the company would like to avoid any kind of mistake as possible ) Again, I have soled this issue on custom modules, hidden identifiers and create a selection field, that runs for me, my customer and tax autgority with mnking issues. The reason on asking here is, I am designing a trytonic module in order on solve this issue on a trytonic way without breaking tryton design or rules , or guidelines for make this module free to the comunity. After review requirements and some extra local erps and invoicing software, I have done that ER diagram, since it is accoording to the tax authority Best regards > Until this point is not clarify, I will not talk any other topics. > > -- > Cédric Krier - B2CK SPRL > Email/Jabber: [email protected] > Tel: +32 472 54 46 59 > Website: http://www.b2ck.com/ > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "tryton" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ > msgid/tryton/20161205013927.GL71015%40tetsuo. > -- Carlos Eduardo Sotelo Pinto Senior Software Developer Claro RPC +51 989550602 GTalk: [email protected] | Skype: csotelop GNULinux RU #379182 | GNULinux RM #277661 Please consider the environment before printing this email Join the campaign at http://thinkBeforePrinting.org -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tryton" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tryton/CAEhw%3DE9oeFn9aT5TnVtuFFH9f0BzGhN4Tr8G3ZwUhO5TGuTcmQ%40mail.gmail.com.
